A major automotive supplier building software for engine management and advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) faced growing complexity in its C/C++ codebase. The embedded systems had to meet…
Industry: AutomotiveClient Profile: European Tier-1 automotive supplier (unnamed)Domain: Embedded software for powertrain and ADAS control unitsTeam Size: ~60 engineers across three continentsLanguages: C, C++Key Standards: MISRA C, MISRA C++, ISO 26262
A major automotive supplier building software for engine management and advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) faced growing complexity in its C/C++ codebase. The embedded systems had to meet strict compliance with MISRA and ISO 26262 requirements, yet:
The software team needed an automated, integrated solution that could ensure rule compliance, enforce architectural discipline, and reduce time-to-audit without slowing development velocity.
CppDepend was deployed as a static analysis platform across all critical components of the embedded software stack. The tool was integrated directly into the team's CI/CD pipeline and configured to align with internal development workflows and safety goals.
| Metric | Before CppDepend | After 12 Weeks |
|---|---|---|
| MISRA violations | 2,030 | 270 |
| Architecture violations | 158 | 27 |
| Audit preparation time | 3–5 days | < 4 hours |
| Merge request rework | High | Reduced by ~35% |
CppDepend stood out because it combined deep code analysis, customizable rules, and architecture control into a single solution that plugged directly into the team’s development workflow. Unlike basic linters or checkers, it provided a strategic view of the codebase — essential in a safety-critical, long-lifecycle environment like automotive embedded software.
By integrating CppDepend into their development workflow, the automotive supplier transformed how they enforced coding standards, managed architecture, and prepared for ISO 26262 audits. What was once a manual, time-consuming process became automated, measurable, and consistent.
CppDepend empowered development teams to catch issues early, reduce review overhead, and maintain safety-critical quality standards at scale. As a result, they improved productivity, reduced technical risk, and confidently moved forward with the development of next-generation embedded vehicle systems — while staying compliant with the strictest automotive safety standards.
Run the analysis on your own projects: coding standards, architecture validation, technical debt and quality gates — in minutes.